Failure replays ยท the record, institution by institution

Every failure on the published record

One page per institution: how each lens read it before it failed, with leads in months, and where a lens saw nothing, a miss shown as a miss. Hazard panel behind the headline: 28 institutions, 206 panel rows, 10 failure events.

InstitutionTypeFailedAction-zone lead (mo)Funding lead (mo)Fraud-masked
Abhyudaya Co-operative Bankucb2023-11-2432missno
Alticonbfc2019-09-12miss30no
CKP Co-operative Bankucb2020-04-301missno
First Leasing Company of Indianbfc2013-12-02missmissyes
Global Trust Bankbank2004-07-2428missyes
IL&FSnbfc2018-08-28miss41yes
Madhavpura Mercantile Co-operative Bankucb2012-06-04missmissyes
Nedungadi Bankbank2002-11-0244missno
New India Co-operative Bankucb2025-02-1347missyes
PMC Bankucb2019-09-23missmissyes
Religare Finvestnbfc2018-01-18miss22yes
Rupee Co-operative Bankucb2022-09-22missmissno
Sambandh Finservemfi2020-10-13miss55yes
Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bankucb2020-01-10missmissyes
United Western Bankbank2006-09-0266missno

How to read this

the four engines catch different failure physics on the same corpus: PCA/score tripwires catch ratio-visible deterioration (GTB 28 months early, Abhyudaya 32); the funding lens catches rollover/run failures the ratios miss (Altico 30 months early on CP reliance, IL&FS 41, Sambandh 55); the forensic screen owns fabricated reporting; the market layer reprices daily between filings for listed names

Hazard method, as served by the payload: Discrete-time hazard (pooled multi-period logit, Shumway 2001) on the vetted dossier panel; outcome = failure within 24 months (annual-filer-safe window; 12m headline via survival scaling); ridge fixed a priori; every reported number is leave-one-institution-out or past/future split - never in-sample.